Consumer Fraud

"Detailed Explantion of the fraud of the IGS Success Criteria"


Take a look at our Detailed Explanation of this consumer fraud. Here we analyse the IGS success criteria and we found their success criteria to be contradictory therefore giving misleading information to the consumer which leads to fraud and resulting in any training to be of no worth.

But first let us explain the details of this consumer fraud... We found this to be the" Typical Failure of the Lay Advantage 2.2 Product" (despite following the training protocols)
           The problem that consumers have with the Lay Advantage 2.2 database is that they are having negative results after following training and criteria. The criteria itself is contradictory in the fact that in the demonstration it is stated that to be successful you only had to have 8 starters in the field and a min of $8,000.00 under the starters field, and to follow the "10%" rule.
           And then in the IGS training they guide clients to follow the criteria in the "TattsBetts" website, such as the Rating, L3S, and the Form fields, and then say that eventually we won't even look at these columns and can be more relaxed on the criteria and the database itself will work just by following the 10% rule, along with a minimum of 8 starters and min of $8,000.00 in the total of the starters field. Hence, what is the use of the training in the first place then, as this then proves the training to be contradictory.
            This then appears to be consumer fraud as they actually don't seem to have any specific training or criteria to follow to be successful. The database was marketed to the public to generate profit and consumers were told from that the database will make about 40k profit per year and more. Since consumers have been using the database, they find that the data is inconsistent and fails, resulting in loss of monies. Each time you lose money on this programme, they seem to have a reason or an excuse as to why you lost the money, and it is always your fault, not the programme. Consumers are losing money, some losing thousands, on top of the cost of the programme for $11,900.
Fraud such as this, is cause to seek action when these companies do not refund the money to the consumer, when the product clearly does not work. These companies play havoc on consumer fraud and seem to get away with it. So what is cosumer fraud exactly? It is when a business or company use deceit and trickery, perpetrated for profit or to gain some unfair or dishonest advantage. The trickery and deceit that IGS play on the consumer is unjust, and If we can't stamp out consumer fraud, then at least we can try to make ourselves more aware of the fraud that's out there.


If you would like to go to "IGS Criteria Definitions"
Click on


Below is the so called criteria to follow, from IGS, for the consumer to be successful with the Lay Advantage 2.2. When comparing the two comparisons, we found it to be consumer fraud, as it was one criteria in the demonstration before purchase and then another criteria once the software was purchased.

Consumer Fraud to be aware of:

            1a. Success criteria as explained during training (pre purchase)

As previously stated on page 1 "There was fraud in the demonstration as it was said that to be successful you only had to have 8 starters in the field and a min of $8,000 under the starters field, and to use the 10% rule." They try to show you how easy it is to use this software and actually tell you, that you don't need any experience or knowledge with horse racing, to be successful and actually prefer you to not have any horse racing experience or knowledge.

This is obviously not the case.

            1b. Success criteria as explained subsequently (post Purchase)

As they say that if you lose your money, then you need to increase the criteria, such as 12 or more starters in the field, more than $8,000.00 under the starter's field and reduce the 10% rule to %5. Then they contradict by training methods in "TattsBet" that then mean nothing and are not viable.



            2a. Success criteria as explained during training (pre purchase)

The database was marketed to the public to generate profit and consumers are told that the database will make about 40k profit per year and more. One particular demonstrator stated that he made over 123K in the first year.

This is obviously not the case.

            2b. Success criteria as explained subsequently (post Purchase)

Since consumers have been using the database, they find that the data is inconsistent and fails, resulting in loss of monies. Some consumers losing thousands on top of the cost of the programme for $11,900.



            3a. Success criteria as explained during training (pre purchase)

The fraud on this database programme "Lay Advantage 2.2" is proven that it does not do what it was marketed to do, leaving the consumers as an unsatisfied customer. Consumers were told that they needed no experience or knowledge on horse racing and that the database does it all for you.

This is obviously not the case.

            3b. Success criteria as explained subsequently (post Purchase)

IGS tell you that you need to go into "TattsBets" to study the "L3S" the "Form" and the "Rating". Consumers are finding that they are becoming frustrated as they go back and forth frantically with from the "TattsBets" Website to their "Lay Advantage 2.2" database program, and as one consumer said "Well, what is the database for, if I have to do it myself.



Victims of fraud happen every day, hopefully we have made you more alert to scams that are out there, so you may more fully prepare yourself for the next time a scammer comes your way. IGS attract consumers to the "Lay Advantage 2.2" program in various ways, one draw card is they market this product to consumers where you could "Work from home" while generating a profit, preying on people's ideals of working at home while taking care of children and family, or the average person just trying to get a head. This couldn't be more from the truth, it is a "Work at Home Scam'.

Or Click

This is not to be interpreted as any legal authority, and your own independant legal advise should be sought.


Page 2


rss image